Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is one of the most important conditions to consider in the case of a child with repeated fevers and urinary infections without an obvious explanation and one of the most important to detect early. VUR is a structural problem with the valve mechanism that normally prevents urine from backing up from the bladder into the ureter and kidney. When a child with VUR develops a urinary tract infection, the infected urine can reflux up to the kidney and cause pyelonephritis – kidney infection – which can leave permanent scars on the developing kidney.
VUR is one of the most common urologic problems seen in children, occurring in approximately 1 to 2 percent of all children and in 30 to 40 percent of children presenting with a urinary tract infection. The condition ranges from mild (Grade I) in which most cases resolve spontaneously as the child grows to severe (Grade V) in which surgical correction is usually required to prevent progressive kidney damage. Early detection, appropriate grading and a management plan tailored to the individual child’s risk of kidney damage is the key to good outcomes.
Vesicoureteral reflux is the retrograde passage of urine from the bladder into the ureter and, in the more severe form, into the kidney. Normally the ureter goes through a tunnel at an angle through the bladder wall . This acts as a one way valve . When the bladder fills and contracts to urinate , the pressure inside the bladder is higher than the pressure inside the ureter , so the tunnel closes and urine is not pushed back up the ureter . This valve mechanism is deficient in VUR, most commonly due to an abnormally short submucosal tunnel or abnormal positioning of the ureteric orifice. This allows retrograde flow of urine, particularly during voiding when bladder pressure is highest.
VUR is graded I to V using the International Reflux Study grading system, based on the appearance of the urinary tract on a voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG), which is an X-ray study performed as the bladder fills with contrast and the child voids. The grade correlates with the risk of spontaneous resolution and the risk for renal impairment. The grading system is detailed in the table below:
Grade | Description | Reflux Extent | Typical Management |
Grade I | Reflux into the ureter only, not reaching the renal pelvis | Ureter only | Often resolves spontaneously; observation |
Grade II | Reflux reaches the renal pelvis and calyces without dilation | Pelvis & calyces, no dilation | High spontaneous resolution; antibiotic prophylaxis if recurrent UTI |
Grade III | Mild to moderate dilation of ureter, pelvis & calyces; calyceal fornices preserved | Mild–moderate dilation | Moderate resolution rate; prophylaxis ± endoscopic treatment |
Grade IV | Moderate dilation with blunting of calyceal fornices; ureteral tortuosity | Significant dilation, tortuous ureter | Lower spontaneous resolution; endoscopic or surgical correction often needed |
Grade V | Gross dilation and tortuosity of the ureter; loss of papillary impressions | Severe dilation, gross reflux | Surgical correction usually required; high renal damage risk |
VUR is classified as primary (due to a congenital abnormality of the ureterovesical junction itself, being the most common form in children) or secondary (due to another condition such as bladder outlet obstruction, neurogenic bladder or high-pressure voiding dysfunction leading to increased bladder pressure to overwhelm a normal valve mechanism). This difference is central to management as primary VUR is managed according to grade and clinical course of the child and secondary VUR is managed by eliminating the causative factor as the primary intervention.
VUR occurs when the normal one way valve mechanism at the junction of the ureter and bladder does not work properly. This failure may be a primary developmental abnormality present from birth, or it may be secondary to another condition which overwhelms an otherwise adequate valve mechanism with excess bladder pressure.
Congenital Defect in the Ureterovesical Junction (UVJ)
The reflux of urine is not felt by the child , VUR itself does not cause direct symptoms . The symptoms of VUR are the symptoms of the conditions it leads to: urinary tract infections and, in advanced cases, kidney damage. It is important to recognize these patterns early in order to preserve kidney function.
Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) in Children
VUR damages primarily the kidney through recurrent pyelonephritis, a kidney infection due to bacteria refluxing from the bladder to the renal parenchyma during episodes of urinary tract infection. Each episode of pyelonephritis causes an inflammatory response in the kidney tissue, which, if severe or recurrent, leads to permanent scarring. Areas of the kidney’s filtering tissue are replaced by non-functional fibrous scar tissue. This is called reflux nephropathy. Multiple scarred segments over a childhood of recurrent infections can have a cumulative effect resulting in a significant overall reduction in renal function and, in severe bilateral cases, can progress to chronic kidney disease, hypertension and, in a small proportion of severely affected individuals, end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis or transplant in adulthood. The severity of damage is directly correlated with the VUR grade, the number and severity of febrile UTI episodes and, critically, the age at which the first infection occurs, with infants under one year being at the greatest risk of new scar formation.
One of the most important things a parent can do to protect their child’s long-term kidney health is to get early specialist assessment for suspected or confirmed VUR. The following situations specifically indicate prompt urological referral.
Child With Recurrent Fever & UTIs – Always Investigate Further
Posted on Google Laxman SinghTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Dr sahab badiya nature he or samjhate bhi bahut ache se haiPosted on Google Pradeep KundalTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Dr Vikas Singh Urologist of KDAHOSPITAL is an excellent Doctor. During and after my Operation Dr Singh took personal care. Dr Singh supporting staff are very caring. I recommend patients suffering from UTI, Prostate Gland problems, Kidney Stone, etc to take treatment from Dr Vikas Singh (Retired Senior Professor Pradeep Kundal from Jhabua Madhya Pradesh)Posted on Google Amit Choudhary 91Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Bhut achha sir hePosted on Google Kailash SinghTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Sir me Mera peostate ka operation kiya tha ab me puri tarah thik hu or mujhe urine bhi bahut ache ata hePosted on Google Priyansh JaiswalTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Excellent doctor and great in naturePosted on Google Amit MandloiTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Good dr Vikas sirPosted on Google Manish ChitarTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. 10 mm kidney stone removed via RIRS method, thank you very much Dr Vikas Sir.Posted on Google shalini upadhyayTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Nice Dr for prostate treatment at kokilaben hospital.
The likelihood of spontaneous resolution of VUR depends primarily on its grade. In 70 to 80 percent of children, Grade I and II VUR resolve spontaneously, usually during the first few years of life as the ureteric submucosal tunnel lengthens with growth. Grade III VUR will resolve spontaneously in approximately 40 to 50 percent of cases. Spontaneous resolution rates for grade IV and V VUR are much lower, usually less than 20 to 30 percent, and correction is more often required surgically or endoscopically. Resolution is also more likely in younger children and unilateral as opposed to bilateral reflux. Resolution is followed up with regular VCUG studies (usually at 12-18 month intervals).
A voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) is an X-ray study. A small catheter is placed in the bladder and contrast dye is placed to fill the bladder. X-ray images are taken as the bladder fills and as the child voids capturing any reflux of contrast up the ureters. There is some mild discomfort from catheter placement ( like a urine catheter ) but it is not significantly painful . Most children tolerate it well, particularly with preparation and a calm environment. The radiation dose is low and the information obtained, grading the reflux and assessing the bladder and urethra is essential to management planning and cannot be obtained with ultrasound alone.
STING (Subureteric Transurethral Injection) also known as HIT (Hydrodistension Implantation Technique) is an endoscopic day-case procedure under general anaesthesia, where a bulking agent (typically dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer) is injected underneath the ureteric orifice through a cystoscope. This creates a ‘mound’ which improves the valve mechanism and reduces or eliminates reflux. There is no incision, it takes about 20 to 30 minutes and the child usually goes home the same day. Success rates (resolution of reflux on follow-up VCUG) are around 70 to 90 percent for Grade I to III VUR and somewhat lower for Grade IV to V. It is a good choice for children who need active treatment but who are not candidates for major reconstructive surgery, or whose families want to avoid it.
Not necessarily, the decision will depend on the grade of VUR, clinical course of the child (breakthrough infections on prophylaxis, new renal scarring), age and whether bladder/bowel dysfunction is also contributing. Many children, especially those with Grade I to III VUR, are successfully managed with antibiotic prophylaxis and observation while awaiting spontaneous resolution. Active treatment (endoscopic STING or surgical reimplantation) should be considered in children with high-grade VUR (IV-V), breakthrough febrile UTIs despite prophylaxis, new or worsening renal scarring, or parental preference for definitive treatment rather than prolonged observation with prophylactic antibiotics. The decision is individual and made in partnership with the family after much discussion of the options.
Primary VUR is due to a congenital developmental abnormality of the ureterovesical junction itself, usually a short or abnormally positioned submucosal ureteric tunnel, existing from birth and not related to other conditions. This is the commonest type, particularly in infants and young children. Secondary VUR is when a secondary condition generates pressures that overwhelm an otherwise adequate UVJ valve mechanism, such as bladder outlet obstruction (e.g. posterior urethral valves), neurogenic bladder, or bladder/bowel dysfunction with high voiding pressures. This is an important distinction, because in secondary VUR the main intervention is to treat the cause of the reflux. If the reflux is treated (by STING or reimplantation) but the underlying high-pressure state is not corrected, it is unlikely to be successful.
Follow-up frequency depends on VUR grade, treatment approach and clinical course. Children with observation/prophylaxis with Grade I to III VUR are usually followed with repeat VCUG at 12–18 month intervals for resolution. Renal ultrasound is generally performed annually to assess kidney growth and exclude new scarring. Renal scarring is usually assessed with DMSA (nuclear medicine) scans at diagnosis and repeated if breakthrough febrile UTIs occur. Resolution is confirmed with a follow-up VCUG at six months after endoscopic STING or surgical reimplantation, followed by ultrasound surveillance. Hypertension may develop years after VUR has apparently resolved and blood pressure should be checked at every visit.
Severe, bilateral, high-grade VUR with recurrent pyelonephritis and progressive bilateral renal scarring (reflux nephropathy) can in a minority of severely affected individuals progress to CKD and, rarely, ESRD requiring dialysis or transplant. This is however the extreme end of the spectrum and is rare with proper management. In the great majority of children with VUR, especially those with lower grades, unilateral disease, and those who receive prompt treatment of febrile UTIs and appropriate management of VUR, significant impairment of kidney function does not occur. Long-term renal outcomes are determined by early detection, prophylaxis for prevention of febrile UTIs, and adequate intervention for high-grade or progressive disease.
Children with a sibling with VUR have about a 25 to 30 percent chance of having VUR themselves, much higher than the 1 to 2 percent rate in the general population. The screening of asymptomatic siblings is an ongoing topic of discussion . Some specialists recommend renal ultrasound screening of younger siblings (especially those under 2 years), with VCUG reserved for those with abnormal ultrasound or any UTI history . Older siblings who are asymptomatic with normal urinary tracts on ultrasound and no history of UTI are usually not screened as most VUR found this way is low grade and resolves spontaneously without ever causing symptoms. Dr Vikas Singh Discusses Sibling screening individually based on index child’s VUR grade and family circumstances.
Yes, constipation is a well-known contributing factor to the development and persistence of VUR via its role in bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD). A loaded rectum mechanically compresses the bladder and bladder neck leading to dysfunctional voiding patterns and elevated bladder pressures that can lead to or exacerbate VUR. Children with VUR and constipation have lower spontaneous resolution rates and higher breakthrough UTI rates on prophylaxis compared with children with normal bowel habits. Management of constipation by dietary modification, adequate fluid intake and laxatives when required, is an important and often underutilised component of management of VUR, and may improve both the reflux itself and the associated UTI risk.
24/7 Services Available
Copyright © 2026 Urology Center | All Rights Reserved
Design and Developed by Namastetu Technologies Pvt.Ltd